Reported on AM 760 radio this morning, courtesy of host David Sirota, was this tail:
A new study suggests that a medium size dog has a greater carbon paw print than that of a 4x4 SUV vehicle on an annual basis. About two times greater in fact.
Does this mean that our owns pets are our greatest threat, or does this give credibility to those who find 'global warming' concerns to be a bit fishy.
Throw me a bone here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
well what we really have to worry about is champagne bubbles. Yes, champagne bubbles are to blame. Apparently there are 20 million carbon dioxide bubbles in every champagne bottle (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126108284326695963.html?mod=WSJ_hps_MIDDLEThirdNews)
ReplyDeleteWow, and new years eve ie coming up. I think we are going to flood Australia this year...